He received his phd from the university of north carolina at chapel hill in 1975. Substituted judgment is often invoked as a guide for decision making when a patient lacks decision making capacity and has no advance directive. However, patients frequently are unable to participate in decision making about their treatment because of the effects of the illness, treatment, or underlying condition. Using substituted judgment, doctors and family members try to make the decision that the patient would have made if he or she were able to make decisions. In this book, the authors, both professors of philosophy and members of the presidents commission on medical ethics, set out a theoretical framework for deciding who. At the same time, a reader can use this volume to b. Thus, attribution of competence in the context of medical decisionmaking. Results analysis revealed three main themes associated with the process of surrogate decision making in dementia. Such scenarios raise difficult questions of how the interests of the earlier and current self ought to be balanced in surrogate decision making. Deciding for others studies in philosophy and health. The act does not provide an account of the underlying concept of best. Decision making for incompetent elderly people is an increasingly serious issue. Third, appeals to the best interest standard are often vague and indeterminate. Pdf legal fundamentals of surrogate decision making.
Withholding or withdrawing lifesustaining treatment. A case of living will with multiorgan failure namrata patil, md mph, director, thoracic intermediate care unit, brigham and womens hospital, harvard medical school, boston. After the cruzan decision and the patient selfdetermination act of 1990, many states enacted proxy statutes specifically for health. However, empirical evidence suggests that the moral basis for substituted judgment is. Despite its intuitive appeal, however, sjs has been the target of a variety of. A physician may determine that a patient does not have the capacity to make a decision for or against surgery for a hip fracture, but she may have the capacity to decide if she wants a sleeping pill or a laxative. The ethics of surrogate decision making as want to read. This issue brings together essays on topics that have been the subject of longstanding debate in the journal of medicine and philosophyabortion, capital punishment, surrogate decisionmaking, and genetic enhancement. Most participants reported that there was not an advance care plan in place for the person living with dementia.
This substitute judgment is used when the patient has previously expressed preferences, or when the surrogate can reasonably infer what the. If a patient is unable to make decisions for themselves about personal care, some agent must make decisions for them. Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision. We argue that the best interest standard for surrogate decision making is problematic for a number of reasons. Limitations of advance directives, substituted judgment, and best interest, commentary 1. This paper examines the approach that the act takes to best interests. He taught at the university of arizona, the university of wisconsinmadison, and the university of. Should age be a deciding factor in ethical decision making.
How to help a patient choose a surrogate decision maker. Part i develops a general theory for making treatment and care decisions for patients who are not competent to decide for themselves. The ethics of surrogate decision making paperback jan 26 1990. If the patient is not capable of giving consent, and time permits, the medical team will seek a surrogate. In the neuroscience intensive care unit nicu, most patients lack the capacity to make their own preferences known.
By incompetent, this chapter is referring to decision making competence as is necessary for the idea of informed consent. Stressful choices for surrogate treatment decision makers. The ethics of surrogate decision making studies in philosophy and health policy by buchananbrock isbn. Two standards should guide surrogate decision making.
When a patient chooses a surrogate, he or she must have capacity to make that decision and be free of coercion. If a patient is conscious, competent, and has reached the age at which the law of the jurisdiction permits medical decision making, then there is no need for a surrogate decision maker. Decisionmaking on behalf of people living with dementia. Respecting autonomy necessarily means respecting patients decisions. Evaluating medical decisionmaking capacity in practice.
Surrogate decision making occurs for nearly half of hospitalized older adults and includes both complete decision making by the surrogate and joint decision making by the patient and surrogate. Narrative views of personal identity and substituted judgment in surrogate decision making find, read and cite all the. Medical decision making capacity is the ability of a patient to understand the benefits and risks of, and the alternatives to, a proposed treatment or intervention including no treatment. Drawing on their extensive experience in philosophy, medical ethics, and public policy. Study shows longterm emotional impact for people who make treatment decisions for ill loved ones. Recently, proxy or surrogate decision making regarding the termination of lifesustaining interventions for incompetent patients has been widely endorsed and promoted. Ama code of medical ethics opinions on patient decisionmaking.
Autonomy, beneficence, and the rights of parents and. Duke professor of philosophy at duke university and also professor of the philosophy of international law at the dickson poon school of law at kings college, london. In chapter 2 of buchanan and brocks deciding for others. The ethics of surrogate decision making, the authors do a thorough job of describing a framework to consider how to ethically treat incompetent patients and honor their selfdetermination. There is no surrogate available and willing to make decisions on behalf of a patient who does not have decision making capacity or no surrogate can be identified. If there is a durable power of attorney for health care, the agent appointed by that document is authorized to make health care decisions within the scope of. Obtenez votre kindle ici, or download a free kindle reading app. It also makes an enormous contribution to current scholarly debates regarding surrogate decision making in medicine, law, and ethics. Competence, capacity, and surrogate decisionmaking the. Pdf the four previous articles in this series have traced the history of patient autonomy and have identified its ethical and legal foundations. The substituted judgment standard of surrogate decision making determines whether or not the life lived and to be lived by. These findings suggest a discrepancy between the normative ethical framework of surrogate decision making and the descriptive reality of how it is actually being carried out. Deciding for others studies in philosophy and health policy. Decision making capacity, on the other hand, is a clinical term that is taskspecific.
In the vast majority of cases of surrogate decision making, the legal system is. The mental capacity act 2005 is an impressive piece of legislation that deserves serious ethical attention, but much of the commentary on the act has focussed on its legal and practical implications rather than the underlying ethical concepts. What is the moral authority of family members to act as surrogates. Best interests, dementia and the mental capacity act 2005. Alternative models of surrogate decision making may mitigate this disparity by employing a valuebased approach over a strict prioritization of patient preferences. Importance hospitalized older adults often lack decisional capacity, but outside of the intensive care unit and endoflife care settings, little is known about the frequency of decision making by family members or other surrogates or its implications for hospital care objective to describe the scope of surrogate decision making, the hospital course, and outcomes for older adults. The substituted judgment standard sjs for surrogate decision making dictates that a surrogate, when making medical decisions on behalf of an incapacitated patient, ought to make the decision that the patient would have made if the patient had decisional capacity. Although the code of medical ethics does not have much to say about mental health. Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in. Get your kindle here, or download a free kindle reading app. Four theoretical ethical perspectives on professionalpatient relationshipsautonomy, justice, virtue ethics, and the ethic of careare surveyed, and some of their implications for the informed consent requirement in health care are sketched out. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public.
View or download all content the institution has subscribed to. Cambridge core political philosophy deciding for others by allen e. A surrogate decision maker is the individual legally authorized to make decisions on behalf of the patient. Because decision making capacity is decision specific, a patient may have capacity to assign a surrogate which is in general felt to be a lowrisk medical decision even if they lack capacity for more complex. A general theory for treatment decisions for incompetent patients, especially minors, the elderly, and psychiatric patients.
Even when the prior wishes of the person with dementia were known, the process of decision. One is brought back to questions such as, does what occurs at fertilization make a moral difference, and if so, why. Physicians can engage patients about decision making in ways that are inclusive of family input, and help consider possible roles of surrogate decision makers for patients who do not have decision making capacity. The goal of surrogate decision making is to reflect what the individual would have decided, if able to speak for him herself. Advance directives ad and surrogate decisionmaking. Privileging advance directives and recreating the judgment of the earlier self via substituted judgment are no longer the obvious solutions, given this conflict. Bioethics research library of the kennedy institute of ethics. New issues and arguments, all published here for the first time, focus on recent thinking in this important area, helping initiate issues and lines of argument that have not been explored previously. Pdf on feb 1, 1999, mark g kuczewski and others published commentary. Generally, patients are free to exercise their autonomy in making decisions about. How to help a patient choose a surrogate decision maker pcnow.
Ama code of medical ethics opinions on patient decision. Surrogate decisionmaker an overview sciencedirect topics. Advance directives, substituted judgment, and the bestinterest standard all have limitations that constrain their usefulness in making medical decisions for patients who. Some features of this site may not work without it. Patient autonomy, assessment of competence and surrogate decision making. Advanced directives and surrogate decision making case. The patient or surrogate and the health care team cannot reach agreement about a decision to withhold or withdraw lifesustaining treatment. Surrogates commonly face a broad range of decisions in both the icu and the hospital ward setting. Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among.
After all, cases are usually controversial precisely because reasonable. Autonomy is the right of children to decide what is best for their parents. First, reliance on the best interest standard is subjective. A surrogate decision maker, also known as a health care proxy or as agents, is an advocate for incompetent patients. Second, it leads to behavior that is intolerant and polarizing. Use the approach of ethical principlism in nursing practice. Surrogate decisionmaking it is well established in medical ethics, practice, and law that the informed consent of competent patients must be secured before treatment. Moreno, ethics deciding for others has much to teach the general reader who may have read press coverage of major court descisions such as cruzan. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. It provides an indepth analysis of competence, articulates and defends a coherent set of principles to specify suitable surrogate. In this book, the authors, both professors of philosophy and members of the presidents commission on medical ethics, set out a theoretical framework for deciding who is competent to make his own life. In chapter 2 of buchanan and brock blog 5 in chapter 2.
896 698 143 791 1454 1182 643 212 48 1022 1452 440 1080 435 1182 1198 1389 1444 957 168 1028 1119 320 1491 242 1163 353 864 1376 275 576 251 39 1006 562